I was studying a e-book on Rethinking Record by the publish-present day Historian Jenkins. The e-book brings out Philosophical views on the writing of Record that is Historiography.
In the 1st section of the e-book he faithfully attempts to define what Record is and his definition is that Record is a discourse. Then proceeds to crack down Record into an ideology, methodology and epistemology. He laments that Record taught in colleges does not incorporate publish present day Record and its many views.
Initial of all I would like to say that the time period Record is a misnomer and should be a discipline that embodies Histories. The time period Record if applied would be brand-centric and rooted in a Western Historic paradigm. There are several Histories circulating today such as black Record, Counter Culture, and Feminist Record and so on.
The writing of Record can by no means be aim. Information are interpreted by Historians as ideological sutures. Previous details can be presented in new-light as the Historiography of writing. For example there are very very little scientific tests on the plight of the female gender in Nazi Germany. The harsh therapy of Germany soon after the defeat of World War One can be noticed empathically as a result in for the rise of Nazi fanaticism. A Marxian would deal with Histories as course struggle. Ideological positions have to be deconstructed. For example Marxism as a grand narrative when put into software in Soviet Russia failed bitterly. Queer background deconstructs the ideology of gender and relationships to sex. Historic text books should include things like many narratives. For example: a soldier’s diary entry. The narratives built by a Nazi mom are some examples. Record taught in colleges is one dimensional. The university text books should incorporate many narratives.
When encountering the methodology of one can’t be normally aim, neutral and scientific. How can we narrate a black mom staying raped by a white? If she writes a poem about it, is it not a section of a Black lifestyle that is repressed. For example if we glimpse at present day Hong Kong we see a favourable affect of it as British Colonization. The British colonizers labored tricky with benefit to make Hong Kong now less than China as prosperous nation. The poverty of India soon after Independence has been even worse than it was throughout the British regime.
Now what is Record as a discourse? A discourse is a narrative, an extended rationalization of a thing. In a Historic discourse the earlier is explored and evidence collected and put into interpretations. For example Hitler’s Mein Kamp and Diary of Annie Frank are both of those discourses, one which promotes the racial satisfaction and superiority of the race and the other the struggles encountered by a lady throughout the second planet war. The ontology of political consciousness gets a discourse wherever people signify Record with many factors of perspective.
Record as an epistemology should encompass many narratives into its literary mildew. For example I would have to read Toni Morrison, if I am writing a historiography of Black Females. Epistemology has to position its roots in the ontological composition of consciousness. Re-deciphering Record should have the ontological composition of poetry, a fiction.